+62 8117788016 info@accuraindonesia.com ID | EN
Home / Knowledge / Beneficial Ownership Rules in Indonesia:...

Beneficial Ownership Rules in Indonesia: Why Nominee Structures Need a Compliance Review

Beneficial Ownership Rules in Indonesia: Why Nominee Structures Need a Compliance Review

Indonesia continues to strengthen corporate transparency through its beneficial ownership rules. For foreign investors, joint venture companies, and businesses using layered ownership structures, this is no longer a simple administrative matter. Beneficial ownership disclosure is now directly linked to anti-money laundering, terrorism financing prevention, corporate governance, licensing, and investment compliance. Indonesia’s main beneficial ownership framework is based on Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018, which applies the principle of recognizing beneficial owners of corporations for the prevention and eradication of money laundering and terrorism financing.

For companies operating in Indonesia, this means that the government expects clarity on who ultimately owns, controls, or benefits from a corporation. This is especially important where nominee shareholders, indirect control, private side agreements, or complex holding structures are involved.

What Is Beneficial Ownership in Indonesia?

A beneficial owner is not always the person whose name appears as the registered shareholder. Under Indonesia’s updated framework, a beneficial owner can include an individual who has the authority to appoint or dismiss directors, commissioners, managers, administrators, or supervisors; controls the corporation; receives benefits directly or indirectly; or is the true owner of corporate funds or shares. The 2025 regulation also confirms that every corporation must determine its beneficial owner through the principle of recognizing beneficial ownership.

The obligation applies broadly to Indonesian corporations, including limited liability companies, foundations, associations, cooperatives, limited partnerships, firms, and civil partnerships. For PT companies, including foreign-owned PT PMA companies, this means ownership documents, control arrangements, shareholder agreements, and actual decision-making authority should be reviewed together rather than separately.

Why Beneficial Ownership Rules Matter for Foreign Investors

Indonesia’s beneficial ownership disclosure regime is part of a wider global push for transparency. FATF guidance emphasizes that countries should ensure competent authorities have access to adequate, accurate, and up-to-date information on the real individuals behind companies. Indonesia’s progress in strengthening anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures was also assessed by FATF, with Recommendation 24 on transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons rated “largely compliant” in the 2025 follow-up report.

For businesses, this creates practical implications. Banks, regulators, licensing authorities, notaries, tax advisers, and counterparties may request more detailed information about the individuals behind the ownership chain. A company that cannot explain its beneficial ownership structure may face delays in corporate actions, licensing updates, banking processes, due diligence, or investment transactions.

The Nominee Structure Problem

Nominee structures are often used when the registered shareholder is not the true economic owner. In practice, this may involve a local individual or entity holding shares on behalf of another party through a private agreement, power of attorney, loan arrangement, or side letter. While such structures may appear convenient, they carry serious risks under Indonesian law.

Article 33 of Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment prohibits domestic and foreign investors in the form of a limited liability company from entering into an agreement or making a statement confirming that share ownership is held on behalf of another party. The same article states that such agreement or statement is null and void by law.

This is why nominee arrangements should not be treated as a harmless workaround. If the registered ownership does not reflect the actual beneficial ownership or control, the structure may create legal uncertainty, compliance exposure, and future dispute risks.

Why Companies Should Review Nominee Arrangements Now

A compliance review is important because Indonesia’s beneficial ownership framework is becoming more verification-oriented. Regulation No. 2 of 2025 specifically addresses verification and supervision of corporate beneficial owners, with the stated aim of improving reporting compliance, optimizing data accuracy, and supporting law enforcement and authorized institutions.

This means companies should not only ask whether beneficial ownership information has been submitted, but also whether the submitted information is accurate, consistent, and supported by corporate documents. If a company’s shareholder register, articles of association, bank KYC records, tax documents, licensing information, and actual control arrangements tell different stories, this may become a compliance red flag.

Key Compliance Risks for Nominee Structures

Companies using nominee-style arrangements may face several risks. First, there is a risk that the underlying agreement may not be legally enforceable if it confirms that shares are held for another party. Second, there may be inconsistencies between the registered shareholder and the person who actually controls the company. Third, banking and transaction due diligence may become more complicated when the ultimate owner cannot be clearly verified.

There is also reputational risk. Beneficial ownership transparency is closely connected to anti-money laundering and anti-corruption expectations. PPATK has highlighted that corporations required to register beneficial ownership include limited liability companies, foundations, associations, cooperatives, limited partnerships, firms, and other corporate forms, and that BO registration is handled through the AHU online system.

Beneficial Ownership Compliance Checklist

Companies in Indonesia should consider reviewing the following areas:

  1. Identify the real beneficial owner
    Confirm the individual who ultimately owns, controls, or receives benefits from the company, not only the person listed as shareholder.
  2. Review shareholder and control documents
    Check shareholder agreements, powers of attorney, loan agreements, side letters, voting arrangements, and profit-sharing agreements.
  3. Check consistency across records
    Ensure that AHU records, company deeds, tax information, bank KYC, licensing data, and internal corporate records are aligned.
  4. Assess nominee risks
    Identify whether any arrangement could be interpreted as share ownership being held for and on behalf of another party.
  5. Update beneficial ownership reporting
    Make sure beneficial ownership information has been properly reported and updated through the relevant system.
  6. Prepare supporting documentation
    Keep clear records explaining the ownership chain, source of funds, shareholder structure, and decision-making authority.

What Foreign Investors Should Do

Foreign investors should review their Indonesian corporate structures before issues arise in banking, licensing, merger and acquisition, tax review, or dispute situations. A proper review should focus on both legal ownership and practical control. If a nominee arrangement exists, businesses should assess whether the structure can be replaced with a legally compliant ownership model, restructuring plan, or clearer shareholder arrangement.

For new investors, the best approach is to structure ownership transparently from the beginning. This includes selecting the right KBLI, checking foreign ownership limits, setting up a compliant PT PMA where required, and ensuring the beneficial owner information is accurate from incorporation.

Conclusion

Indonesia’s beneficial ownership rules are no longer just a reporting formality. They are part of a broader compliance framework that connects corporate transparency, anti-money laundering standards, investment law, and regulatory supervision. For companies using nominee structures or complex ownership arrangements, now is the right time to conduct a compliance review.

A transparent structure can help reduce legal uncertainty, improve investor confidence, and prevent problems during licensing, banking, due diligence, or future corporate transactions.

Start Consulting About Your Business Needs

Contact us now to get a free consultation and start growing efficiently with our professional team.

Contact via WhatsApp